ETMDN: Communication on the Common Practice of Distinctiveness - figurative marks containing descriptive or non-distinctive words
European Trade Mark and Design Network (ETMDN) [[{"type":"media","fid":"4554","view_mode":"media_large","instance_fields":"override","attributes":{"class":"media-image wp-image-2329 alignright","typeof":"foaf:Image","style":"","width":"136","height":"65"}}]]is a network connecting national and regional Intellectual Property Offices, User Associations and other IP Organisations. The network has on 2 October 2015 published a communication on a common practice in relation to when a figurative mark containing purely descriptive or non-distinctive words passes the absolute grounds examination. The aim of the common practice is to establish and communicate clarity, legal certainty, quality and usability for both applicant and office. According to Article 3(1)(b) and (c) of the Directive 2008/95/EC trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character, and trade marks which consist exclusively of signs or indications which may serve, in trade, to designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, geographical origin, or the time of production of the goods or of rendering of the service, or other characteristics of the goods or services, shall not be registered, or if registered shall be liable to be declared invalid. The distinctiveness of the mark is assessed by reference to the goods or services in respect of which registration is sought and by reference to the perception of the relevant public. The common practice introduces principles to be generally applied and to cover large majority of cases. The distinctiveness of the mark is still assessed on a case-by-case basis and the principles serve as guidance in order to ensure that the different offices come to a similar outcome. In order to determine if the threshold of distinctiveness is met due to the figurative features in the mark the following criteria are considered:
A. With respect to the word elements in the mark:
- Typeface and font
- Combination with colour
- Combination with punctuation marks and other symbols
- Position of the word elements (sideways, upside-down, etc.)
Non-distinctive examples:
[[{"type":"media","fid":"4553","view_mode":"media_large","instance_fields":"override","attributes":{"class":"media-image size-full wp-image-2328 alignnone","typeof":"foaf:Image","style":"","width":"352","height":"53"}}]]Distinctive examples:
[[{"type":"media","fid":"4552","view_mode":"media_large","instance_fields":"override","attributes":{"class":"media-image size-full wp-image-2327 alignnone","typeof":"foaf:Image","style":"","width":"361","height":"36"}}]]B. With respect to the figurative elements in the mark:
- Use of simple geometric shapes
- The position and proportion (size) of the figurative element in relation to the word element
- Whether the figurative element is a representation of, or has a direct link with, the goods and/or services
- Whether the figurative element is commonly used in trade in relation to the goods and/or services applied for
Non-distinctive examples:
[[{"type":"media","fid":"4551","view_mode":"media_large","instance_fields":"override","attributes":{"class":"media-image size-full wp-image-2326 alignnone","typeof":"foaf:Image","style":"","width":"477","height":"86"}}]]Distinctive examples:
[[{"type":"media","fid":"4550","view_mode":"media_large","instance_fields":"override","attributes":{"class":"media-image size-full wp-image-2325 alignnone","typeof":"foaf:Image","style":"","width":"188","height":"72"}}]]C. With respect to both the word and figurative elements in the mark:
- How combinations of the criteria affect distinctiveness
